• What’s so fascinating about this is how differently NJ has reacted to Mandarin immersion compared to many other districts. We know that in many urban school districts, Mandarin immersion is offered both as an aid to  Chinese-speaking students and to encourage English-speaking middle class families to stay in their districts rather than going to the suburbs or to private schools.

    But how does it play out in other, non-urban, school districts? If your child is in Mandarin immersion, tell us why your district created your program. What are the motivations for school districts? What are the motivations for parents?

    =====

    From Patch.com

    Two Mothers Hand-Deliver Petition Opposing Mandarin Charter School to Department of Education More than 1,200 residents from the three sending school districts signed the online petition.

    By Greta Cuyler

    Two mothers, one from Princeton and one from neighboring South Brunswick, hand-delivered on Tuesday a “Say No to Proposed Mandarin Charter School (PIACS)” petition to the New Jersey Department of Education.

    Lisa Grieco-Rodgers of Monmouth Junction and Liz Lempert of Princeton Township, anticipating a request from Princeton International Academy Charter School for another year’s planning extension, delivered a petition containing the signatures of more than 1,200 residents of Princeton, South Brunswick, Plainsboro and West Windsor asking that Acting Commissioner of the Department of Education Christopher Cerf and Director of the Office of Charter Schools Carly Bolger deny any requested extension.

    Grieco-Rodgers and Lempert hoped to deliver their petition to Cerf but Alan Guenther, the department’s director of communications, accepted the petition on Cerf’s behalf. Citing the more than 500 residents from the three sending school districts who showed up to protest PIACS before the South Brunswick Zoning Appeals Board, Grieco-Rodgers said residents’ concerns include adequate numbers of restrooms, proper food prep area, private-enclosed nurse’s office and proper child drop off/pick up.

     

    Story is here.

    Another story on the topic is here.

  • The Center for Applied Linguistics at the University of Minnesota  keeps one of the best databases on immersion K-12 schools in the country. They’re updating it now – make sure your program’s in there, if you’re a total or partial immersion program in any language.

    And while you’re at it, check out the MIPC web site for schools and make sure we’ve got correct info about your Mandarin program.

    CARLA’s page is here.

    Be CountedThis summer, the Center for Applied Linguistics (CAL) is updating their searchable Directory of Foreign Language Immersion Programs in U.S. Schools. See if your total or partial immersion program should be included. > Learn more.

  • The Lake Oswego School District will offer two half-day Kindergarten Mandarin Immersion classes in 2011-12, contingent upon hiring qualified staff and on achieving sufficient enrollment to support the program.

    These classes will be located at River Grove Elementary School . Instruction time is 50% in Mandarin and 50% in English. The literacy component of instruction employs the Read Well program, which is the district’s early childhood reading curriculum.

    The Kindergarten Mandarin Immersion Program is a stand-alone program. Enrollment in this program does not guarantee placement in next-level programs that may be added to LOSD offerings. To date, no commitment has been made to continue this program beyond the kindergarten level.

    Enrollment in the Kindergarten Mandarin Immersion Program will be conducted by lottery. Those wishing to participate in the lottery must submit their application to the District Administration Office no later than 3:30 PM on Friday, July 15, 2011. Parents interested in enrolling their students should complete and submit the application form as soon as possible.

    Their website is here.

  •  

     

     

     

    The soon-to-open program (they’re hoping) has  a new web site at

     www.cicusd.com


  • From Patch.com

    Charter Schools Rally Targets Suburbs

    Senator Codey calls fight over charter schools a ‘watershed moment.’

    By Laura Griffin and Marilyn Joyce Lehren | Email the authors | June 22, 2011

     

     PHOTOS (11)
     Sen. Richard Codey told a crowd of about 120 at the Save Our Schools rally in Millburn on Tuesday night that the fight over charter schools is a “watershed moment” in education.

    Codey said if so-called “boutiques” like the Mandarin-immersion charter schools proposed for Livingston, Millburn and neighboring districts are approved, the “the domino effect would be mind boggling.”

    One attendee at the meeting was Bob Russo, the former mayor of Montclair.  He said the application for a proposed charter school, Quest Academy, had been turned down three times and was still awaiting approval.  Russo was outspoken in his criticism of the school, which he said “would drain $2 million from our budget, which is already broken. We cannot afford the school in Montclair, we don’t need the school, and we don’t want the school.”

    Rudy Fernandez, mayor of Livingston, expressed similar sentiment.

    “It’s not a question whether it’s a Mandarin immersion school or a science school. What’s really important … is that this is going to be an incredible burden on the local taxpayers at a time when the state aid is being cut to the school boards and towns have incredible pressures on their budgets.”

    “No one ever talked about charter schools for the best school systems in the state of New Jersey,” Codey said. “So this is a watershed moment. If this is allowed to happen there is a domino effect, it’s as simple as that. You might as well almost forget about the public school system. You can imagine the kind of ‘boutique’ charter schools that would come about. Maybe the Children of the Daughters of the American Revolution. I mean it can get that stupid.”

    The rally was one of three statewide intended to demonstrate support for charter school reform bills pending in the state legislature. Jill Kimelman of Millburn and Alle Ries of Maplewood organized the local Save our Schools rally held inside the Bauer Center in Taylor Park. Many of the demonstrators brought their children and carried signs supporting the bill that would give voters a voice on whether charter schools could open in their school district.

    Charter schools have been a contentious issue in the towns. In recent weeks, the local school districts have sent strongly worded letters opposing the applications to the state Department of Education, and several township councils passed resolutions opposing charter schools in their communities.

    “Charter schools are not the enemy per se,” said Assemblywoman Mila Jasey. “They have a role, but we need to define that role and have a say in where they are located and make sure that where they are located they have the support of the community.”

    Codey and Jasey, Democrats running for re-election in the new 27th District, said they fully support the reforms winding their way slowly in Trenton. It is doubtful, however, if they will have a chance for a vote before the session ends June 30.

    One of the bills (A3845 and S2243) requires local approval before a new charter can open. This bill has passed the Assembly Education Committee. A second bill, (A3356) requires charter schools to have financial and educational transparency and accountability.

    Millburn and the other rally locations, South Brunswick and Highland Park, were chosen because proposed language-immersion schools have created a groundswell of community support for the reforms.

    Codey said while they are designated as public schools, charter schools act essentially as private schools that take district money. “Your tax dollars will follow the children to the ‘private school.’ You cannot make up (the cost) with savings because you’re not going to be able to close a school. You’re not going to be able to close a classroom,” he said. “There are just not enough kids.”

    In a statement in response to the rallies, Carlos Perez, the president and CEO of the New Jersey Charter Schools Association, took umbrage with the notion that charter schools are essentially private schools paid for with public money.

    “Charters are public schools open to all and they are funded with taxes – the taxes paid by the parents of kids sitting at desks in a charter school. State education policy calls for the funding to follow the student, not the district,” he said.

    Opposition to the charter schools has spurred many local residents who have not previously been part of the political process to act by writing letters to state lawmakers and also by organizing petitions that now have hundreds of names.

    Matt Stewart of Millburn Parents Against Charter Schools and Jerry Meng of Save Our Public Schools over Charters, for instance, both attended Tuesday’s rally for the groups they represent.

    “Having the legislators here is the most critical. They need to do their jobs so we don’t have to keep doing this,” Stewart said.

    The Livingston Township Council passed a resolution opposing any charter school from opening in Livingston. Mayor Rudy Fernandez said, “It’s not a question whether it’s a Mandarin immersion school or a science school. What’s really important … is that this is going to be an incredible burden on the local taxpayers at a time when the state aid is being cut to the school boards and towns have incredible pressures on their budgets.”

    Perez, in his statement released earlier on Tuesday, addressed the bill that would require community approval.

    “Requiring a referendum on charter schools is not only bad public policy, it undermines the entire premise of a charter school. It’s a reaction to a challenge of the status quo by the entrenched education establishment to stop the thriving charter school movement in New Jersey in its tracks,” he said in the statement.

    He went on to say that charter schools are unique public schools intended to provide parents and children options.

    “Charter schools are created to fill a void in the traditional public school curriculum,” he said. “If a significant number of parents don’t think a void exists, the local effort to form a school would go nowhere. Charters are a perfect example of supply and demand. No demand — no supply.”

    Assemblyman Albert Coutinho, who also attended the Milburn rally, said “Public education in New Jersey is in pretty good shape. However in our urban areas we have a crisis. Therefore we need to focus our fixes in those areas that aren’t working. Charter schools can be part of the answer, and they should be part of the answer in our urban areas.”

    “But let’s hold them accountable,” Coutinho said. “Let’s not have them disrupt where things are working.”

    Jon Blinderman of Livingston – who delivered a petition that now has close to 800 names to his school board members last month – on Tuesday night was invited by Save Our Schools to speak at the Millburn rally.

    “They say (the opposition to the Chinese charter schools) is dividing the community in Livingston, but this is not anti-Mandarin or anti-Asian. It’s not about that,” Blinderman said. “I would stand up against it if it were Hebrew immersion or Spanish immersion or NFL immersion.”

     

    More here.

  • From Centraljersey.com

    BREAKING NEWS: PIACS misses imposed zoning deadline
    DATE POSTED: Monday, June 20, 2011 2:28 PM EDT
    By Charles W. Kim, The Packet Group
    Despite several reprimands by the South Brunswick zoning chairman during a meeting on June 2, representatives of the Princeton International Academy Charter School and its proposed landlord missed another deadline.

    Township Planner Brian Bidlack confirmed Monday that the proposed charter school did not submit required plans and revised drawings to the township’s planning department by Friday’s June 17 deadline.

    Mr. Bidlack also said the attorney for the building’s owner, 12 P&Associates LLC, requested the application for several zoning variance waivers be adjourned until September.

    Zoning board Chairman Martin Hammer and engineer Frank Antisell chided the applicants several times during the June 2 meeting for not having addressed concerns brought up at an April 14 meeting and for not having submitted revised site plan diagrams to the township in time to be sufficiently reviewed.

    More info here.