• Beth

    ===

    Report says Mandarin charter school not ‘likely to succeed’

    A report prepared to help the Menlo Park City School District board decide if it should allow a Mandarin immersion charter school in the district concludes the petition is flawed and the school is not “likely to succeed.” The board is scheduled to vote on the petition on Wednesday, Nov. 12, at 6:30 p.m.

    State law limits the grounds on which the board can deny the petition. The 56-page report, prepared by a team of district administrators and consultants, goes through each of the areas in which the board has some leeway when making its decision.

    The report did conclude the petition had gathered enough signatures. The law requires signatures from the parents of at least 50 percent of the 100 students the petition says the school will serve the first year; the parents must be “meaningfully interested” in enrolling their children in the charter school.

    The district contacted each signer. While many did not have appropriately aged children or said they no longer wanted their names on the petition, the district found that 44 in-district and 14 out-of-district parents with children who would be in kindergarten or first grade next year had signed — eight more than the required minimum.

    Please read more here.

  • Redwood City district approves Mandarin immersion program

    Open house for interested parents Tuesday

    As the Menlo Park City School District struggles with a Mandarin immersion charter school proposal by district parents, the Redwood City School District has approved its own Mandarin immersion program, set to start next fall.

    Redwood City district officials say students from the district, which includes parts of Atherton and Woodside as well as Redwood City, will be given first priority, but that out-of-district students will also be accepted as long as classrooms have space for them.

    Please read more here.

  • Feds award $375,000 grant to proposed Mandarin immersion charter in Menlo Park

    UPDATED:   11/08/2014 12:57:07 AM PST

    The proposed Menlo Mandarin Immersion Charter School has been awarded a $375,000 federal grant for startup costs.

    But for the money to be delivered, a petition to establish the charter must be approved. The charter’s founders are hoping to open two kindergarten and two first grade classes in the Menlo Park City School District by next fall.

    In April, the district turned down their request to launch a Mandarin immersion program at one or more of the existing schools.

    Carol Cunningham, one of the leaders of the charter school effort, said the grant would be spent on one-time startup costs including furniture, curriculum and technological equipment. It cannot go toward operational expenses such as teachers’ salaries or lease payments, she noted.

    The district’s board is scheduled to consider approving or denying the charter petition at its meeting Wednesday.

    Please read more here.

  •  

    Toronto School District Cancels Plans for Confucius Institute

    Photo

    In early 2011, Hu Jintao, left, who was president of China at the time, visited a Confucius Institute at Walter Payton College Preparatory High School in Chicago. The program has entered partnerships with hundreds of schools and universities around the world.
    In early 2011, Hu Jintao, left, who was president of China at the time, visited a Confucius Institute at Walter Payton College Preparatory High School in Chicago. The program has entered partnerships with hundreds of schools and universities around the world.Credit Pool photo by Chris Walker

    The Toronto District School Board’s vote to cancel plans for a Confucius Institute marks the latest setback for China’s language- and culture-based soft-power initiative.

    Canada’s largest school district moved on Wednesday to terminate its agreement with the institute, which would have offered after-school Chinese language and culture classes, over concerns about China’s human rights record and restrictions on academic freedom.

    The decision followed months of debate, with groups including Tibetan exiles and members of the Falun Gong, a spiritual movement banned in China, arguing that the program be stopped on grounds that it would give the Chinese government undue influence over local education. Others, including members of the local Chinese community, argued in favor of the language-learning opportunities the program would have provided and said politics would not play a part.

    Please read more here.

  • The amazing Jamila Nightingale at Parents of African American Students Studying Chinese, is holding a forum for school administrator on Nov. 13 on how to recruit and retain African-American students in Chinese immersion schools. Make sure your school’s administrators (if they’re anywhere in the Bay area) get there.

    Before the forum, Jamila is having a conference call to hear from parents about these issues, to make sure that their opinions, concerns and voices are included in the information being presented to administrators. Check out the PAASSC web site to get involved in the call on Sunday, Nov. 9, 2014.

    And then make sure your school’s administrators get involved.

    Flyer - New Extended Deadline

  • Mark Zuckerberg Speaking Chinese: Brave, Foolish, or Both?

    你什么意思?What are you trying to say?

    Portraits of Mark Zuckerberg by Chinese artist Zhu Jia, at gallery in Singapore last year (Reuters)

    About ten days ago Facebook’s founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg posted a video of himself giving a speech and handling a Q&A with students at Tsinghua University in Beijing — and doing it in Chinese. You’ve probably seen it already, but here it is again just in case.

    A few hours later, Isaac Stone Fish of FP posted an item with his answer to the question that most Westerners who’ve been in China had been asked by their friends. Namely, How did Zuckerberg sound? And his answer was harsh.
    Please read more here.
  • Why is bilingual education ‘good’ for rich kids but ‘bad’ for poor, immigrant students?

    If you follow the public debate about bilingual education, you know that there are two basic opposing views. As Claire Bowern, the author of the following post, writes,

    To put it bluntly, bilingualism is often seen as “good” when it’s rich English speakers adding a language as a hobby or another international language, but “bad when it involves poor, minority, or indigenous groups adding English to their first language, even when the same two languages are involved.

    Here is a piece about the value of bilingualism for all students. Bowern is an associate professor of linguistics at Yale University and a fellow in The OpEd Project’s Public Voices project who has been researching topics s related to language and society, including bilingualism, for 15 years. She also works as an advisor to Native American and Australian indigenous groups on language reclamation, maintenance, and bilingual education issues.

    Please read more here.